13 March 2012

ACC privacy breach may spark comp claims - Greens

An article from the Dominion Post by Phil Kitchin
A privacy breach which saw details of more than 9000 ACC claims erroneously released could lead to claims for compensation, say the Greens.
Private details of more than 9000 ACC claims – some featuring well-known people – have been emailed to a person who should not have received them, in what is being described as one of the worst privacy breaches in New Zealand history.
The details included personal information on nearly 250 clients from ACC's most secure unit – the sensitive claims unit. Full names, the nature of each claim and dispute, and individual claim numbers were among the information revealed.
The Greens were calling for an independent investigation into the breach.
ACC spokesman Kevin Hague said claimants who had their details passed on would need support and "possibly compensation depending on the nature of the breaches".
"It appears the ACC board and the minister have known about the privacy breaches for some time but have done nothing about them.
"We need to know what the board knew, what the minister knew, and why they have not acted. Only an independent investigation can achieve that."
Senior management at ACC were told three months ago that they had possibly made the biggest privacy breach in New Zealand history, but they have made no effort to investigate or contain the breach with the recipient.
Some of the names in the huge files were public figures, the recipient said, and they also included victims of violent and sexual crimes. Without going through all the files, the recipient recognised at least 10 people on the lists.
The sensitive claims unit is a special unit containing ACC's most sensitive claimants, including sexual abuse and rape victims.
Before the warning to ACC management, ACC's board and former ACC minister Nick Smith were told about systemic failures of the corporation's processes for respecting the privacy rights of claimants.
The board was given an example of a branch medical adviser who covertly communicated with an ACC assessor providing false information to manipulate a medical report in ACC's favour.
A board member was sufficiently alarmed by the allegations to raise the matters at a higher board level, which resulted in a meeting between the recipient of the information and ACC management in December.
At the meeting, the recipient and their advocate told ACC's national manager of recovery independence services, Philip Murch, that ACC had potentially caused the biggest privacy breach in New Zealand's history.
Hague said there seemed to be a "lax" privacy culture at ACC which undermined the trust New Zealanders had in the scheme, he said.
"In addition to privacy breaches, it appears ACC staff are covertly communicating with advisers to manipulate medical reports in ACC's favour.
"Such behaviour is probably unlawful, and is miles away from the premise of a no-fault public scheme."
Hague said the Government's push to cut costs could behind the "negative behaviour" at the Corporation.

SENSITIVE DETAILS
ACC was told that its own staff emailed the recipient sensitive details of thousands of claims, which could result in thousands of complaints because of incompetent privacy management practices. ACC was told it would be horrified to know what material it had fired off.
But in spite of the general warning to the board and the explicit disclosures in December – including a formal written complaint – ACC management have not investigated the privacy breach with the recipient.
The same details also appear to have been sent to more than 50 ACC managers, most of them not from the sensitive claims unit, raising questions about the security of information supplied to the unit.
Personal information held by the unit is not supposed to be divulged to anyone outside the unit without the permission of the client.
The recipient, an ACC client, did not want to be named because they feared being swamped by telephone calls from other ACC clients concerned their details have been distributed nationwide.
The recipient blacked out all personal details of claimants when providing documents to The Dominion Post.
Privacy Commissioner Marie Shroff said if the emailed data involved personal details of thousands of people the breach was likely to be one of New Zealand's most serious.
She expected government agencies to adhere to her office's notification guidelines, which include contacting those whose privacy has been breached, getting the information back, minimising harm and making sure it did not happen again.
New Zealand laws are behind other jurisdictions in not providing for mandatory reporting of data privacy breaches and her office is developing a view on the need for there to be consequences for data breaches.
An ACC spokeswoman said the corporation took all privacy complaints "extremely seriously" but it had received no formal complaint.
ACC had implemented several safeguards to "ensure all client information is protected and managed correctly".
In 2010, ACC apologised after it admitted sending up to 2000 companies private information about workers' accidents that should have gone to other employers.
The information included names, descriptions of accidents, injuries, treatment and ACC payments.
A Petone business owner blew the whistle after she was sent private details about a Whanganui man she did not know, who had suffered a fall.
© Fairfax NZ News

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/6563083/ACC-privacy-breach-may-spark-comp-claims-Greens

1 comment:

  1. hi im one of the 9000 clients that had information sent out i had my phone call on wednsday the 14th and received my letter on thursday and as for information not being older than 2010 i had my review in june 29th 2009 so where ever your getting this info from it is very conflicted and in my phone call i was asked for my name and address and then told of the extent of information given from my review from who was there medical records time and place and review outcome full disclosure and infact the person i spoke with was very sarcastic and when told i had acc in high court appeal told me i had to go through district court first on telling him i had his answer to me was declined were you so on that i hung the phone up on him after letting him know id be calling my lawyer in which ive done and the letter in question i have also forwarded to my lawyer and to be honest if it was just review process info then i believe everyone of these was delined at that process and that in it self sez it all for acc classify degenerative and declined on the basis acc does not cover degeneration so for all you kiwis out there getting hurt at home at work or in sport dont grow old pay your levies and let the system acc system rip you off

    ReplyDelete